| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

08_faq

Page history last edited by johnlittlephysics 10 years, 3 months ago

08 Lenses FAQ


  •  Post your questions, comments, ideas etc. below using Add a comment.
  • Use Reply to continue a tread of ideas or discussion.   

  • Also see questions posted here.

Comments (26)

Koh Xin Qi said

at 2:59 pm on Jan 11, 2014

Dear Mr Ang,
What does longer focal length mean?

johnlittlephysics said

at 8:09 pm on Jan 11, 2014

A thinner biconvex lens has a longer focal length f, and bends light rays through a smaller angle.
If object distance u > f, the real image formed is further away from the lens (larger image distance v) and larger, compared to case with a smaller f.
See https://www.dropbox.com/s/m87kdw4f4f1klyw/Photo%2011-1-14%207%2040%2020%20pm.jpg

Tam Li June said

at 9:06 pm on Jan 11, 2014

Hi Mr Ang,

May you please explain 1(a) and 1( d ) of WS 8.3?

Thank you.

johnlittlephysics said

at 12:05 pm on Jan 12, 2014

WS 8.3 Q1(d)
Problem solving strategy: Draw additional rays that are parallel to given ray; draw ray passing through optical centre of lens.
- parallel rays (not horizontal) will meet (intersect) at a point on the focal plane (a vertical plane at the focal point).
- ray passing through centre of lens would go straight through; so this ray meets the focal plane at a point (called it P) and hence all other parallel rays would also pass through P.

johnlittlephysics said

at 12:13 pm on Jan 12, 2014

WS 8.3 Q1(a)
When horizontal light rays (e.g. from distant object) pass through a lens, they would converge and pass through the focal point F. Likewise in a reverse direction, any light rays passing through a focal point F will then become horizontal after passing through the lens (the 3rd type of standard path of light rays, see page 271 in textbook).

(Note: The above idea is also called the principle of reversibility of light.)
Ref: Basic http://schools.matter.org.uk/SchoolsGlossary/reversibility.html
Ref: Advance: http://electron6.phys.utk.edu/optics421/modules/m1/Fermat's%20principle.htm

Tessa Ng said

at 9:23 pm on Jan 11, 2014

Hi Mr Ang,

why is the answer for WS 8.2 question f drawn like that, where there is no image and there are so many light rays?

Thank You

johnlittlephysics said

at 12:17 pm on Jan 12, 2014

WS 8.2 Q2(f): u = infinity
The object is at infinity (very far away), so we can't draw the object on the small scale, but we draw parallel light rays from it.
Such a light source is the same as what you used (physics lab window grilles far away) in practical PR1 to estimate the focal length of a lens.

Kee Ting said

at 3:57 pm on Jan 12, 2014

Hi Mr Ang,

Why is it that in the case of u<f where the application is stated to be magnifying glass, we are able to see the image but not the object? (For example, when you look through a magnifying glass you see the image but not the object- though the light ray passes through the object as well.)

johnlittlephysics said

at 4:17 pm on Jan 12, 2014

The eye only sees one set of light rays that reach its retina. These light rays (converging at the retina to give a sharp image) appear to have come from an "object" which upright, magnified and behind the original object - this is what the eye sees as the image.
The light rays from actual object no longer appear to come from its original position - this object is no longer seen by the eye.
The effect of this converging lens (only see magnified virtual image), is different from that of a transparent plane glass (which has little effect on the original light rays).

Tam Li June said

at 4:08 pm on Jan 12, 2014

Hi Mr Ang,

May you also explain question 1(c) of WS 8.3?

Thank you very much

johnlittlephysics said

at 5:21 pm on Jan 12, 2014

Problem-solving strategy:
1. For each ray (A), we draw another ray B parallel to it and passing through the optical centre, so it goes straight through.
2. Parallel rays will converge (meet) at the focal plane (vertical plane at F), and this point is given by ray B intersecting the focal plane (at point say C).
3. Now we can draw the original ray A after the lens, also passing through the same point C.

Tam Li June said

at 6:12 pm on Jan 12, 2014

Hi Mr Ang,

Regarding the case of u=f,

If we want to see a virtual image, where do we put the eyes in the ray diagram, at - infinity or + infinity? Where the image be at?
What about for real image, where do we draw the eyes too?

Thank you.

johnlittlephysics said

at 9:35 pm on Jan 12, 2014

Wrt the ray diagram, if the object is to the left of the lens,
1. we expect a real image to the right of the lens, so we would put a screen on the right of the lens (we just draw the real image, not the eye), and view the screen where the light rays converge, just like your practical PR 1.
2. We expect a virtual image to the left of the object, so we would position our eyes to the right of the lens and view the virtual image, as shown in http://www.leydenscience.org/physics/electmag/con_inf.jpg

johnlittlephysics said

at 8:56 pm on Jan 14, 2014

Kah Leng: AS8.2 - Could you explain the answers for the following questions?
Q2 - focal length, Q3 (all parts)

johnlittlephysics said

at 9:10 pm on Jan 14, 2014

AS 8.2:
Q3: Refer to a ray diagram with triangles formed by a ray through the optical centre of lens.
Together with the vertical lines (of object & image), the ray gives similar triangles on both sides of the lens.
The object distance u & image distance v, both are proportional to the height of object/image.
(a)(i) real image: image is 3 times object also means v/u = 3
So f given, v = 3u, substitute into lens formula to solve for u.
(a)(ii) virtual image: v = -3u, similarly, find u.

(b) reduce size of image means reduce reduce v. This can be done by increasing u.

johnlittlephysics said

at 9:18 pm on Jan 14, 2014

AS 8.2, Q2: Using the lens formula requires a sign convention:
If image is real v is positive, if image is virtual v is negative.
Since image is on the same side as the object, it is virtual, so v = -150 mm.
Apply the lens formula to find f.

Tam Li June said

at 10:30 pm on Jan 14, 2014

Hi Mr Ang,

May I check for WS 8.4 question 3(b), why do we not use the negative sign for V, even though it is a virtual image?

Thank you.

johnlittlephysics said

at 11:03 pm on Jan 14, 2014

Negative sign was used: v = -50.0 must be substituted into the lens formula.

johnlittlephysics said

at 10:27 pm on Jan 23, 2014

405 Celeste: Could I ask you a few of questions regarding lenses please?
Firstly, are there two possibilities on the nature of the light rays and image formed for u=f?
Secondly, what do we get when we divide something by infinity, or when infinity is divided by something?
Lastly, for the situation u=infinity, how will we know exactly which position to draw the parallel rays?

johnlittlephysics said

at 10:34 pm on Jan 23, 2014

1. Yes, one for v = + infinity and - infinity
2. If N is a non-zero number: N / infinity = 0 and infinity / N = infinity
3. u = infinity means object at infinity, we draw oblique (at an angle) parallel rays incident on the lens (including one ray through optical centre), so that rays meet at a point on the focal plane, and a real, inverted and diminished image can be drawn.

johnlittlephysics said

at 1:33 pm on May 8, 2014

402 Li June: may I check if it is true that in lenses, the rule of as u increase, v decreases is not true for cases of u=f, f<u<2f? As the image distance seems to increase rather then decrease as compared to for u<f?

johnlittlephysics said

at 1:37 pm on May 8, 2014

The rule of thumb, u increases as v decreases and vice versa is only true for real inverted images when u > f (object on one side, image on other side of lens).
This includes f < u < 2f.
The rule is no longer valid when
a. u = f when image at v= +/- infinity
b. u < f when image is virtual, and v is negative
Also refer to the graph of v against u plotted at https://www.dropbox.com/s/562h8k1xdqbh2nm/Photo%208-5-14%201%2018%2052%20pm.jpg

johnlittlephysics said

at 2:45 pm on Aug 11, 2014

405 Celeste: Could you help me answer a physics question please? It's regarding lenses.
Q: A lens formed a blurred image of an object on the screen. How could we form a sharp image on the screen?

(1) by moving the object towards the lens and screen
(2) by moving the object away from the lens and screen
(3) by using a brighter object at the same position
(4) by using a lens of a longer focal length placed at the same position
See https://www.dropbox.com/s/c4jkv6z1sohbtik/Photo%2011-8-14%201%2054%2045%20pm.png

johnlittlephysics said

at 2:48 pm on Aug 11, 2014

What do you think is(are) possible answer(s)? Explain your reasoning.

johnlittlephysics said

at 8:18 pm on Aug 18, 2014

Celeste: Is the answer number (2), because as the object distance becomes further, the image distance gets smaller, hence the point of convergence of the light rays falls on the screen, forming the sharpest image?

johnlittlephysics said

at 8:21 pm on Aug 18, 2014

If the diagram you provided shows the system in the question, then (2) is the best answer. Your explanation is correct.

You don't have permission to comment on this page.